The Hole in The Wall, Southsea - pub details
| [image 2] | [image 3] | [image 4] |
Address: 36 Great Southsea Street, Southsea, Hampshire, PO5 3BY [map] [gmap]
Tel: 023 9229 8085
Portsmouth & Southsea (0.6 miles), Portsmouth Harbour (0.8 miles), Fratton (1 mile)
Pub facilities/features:
- Food served, Real ale
Pub suggested by Lee Newton on 2 Jul 2003
NB: Information may be incomplete or out of date as this pub is not currently registered.
Is this your pub? Register now.
other pubs nearby:
India Arms, Portsmouth (0.0 miles), Barley Mow, Southsea (0.0 miles), Indigo's Wine Bar, Southsea (0.1 miles), Wheelbarrow, Southsea (0.1 miles), Langtrys, Southsea (0.2 miles) - see more nearby pubs
user reviews of the Hole in The Wall, Southsea
please note - reviews on this site are purely the opinion of site visitors, so don't take them too seriously.
5 most recent reviews of 39 shown - see all reviews
| I would like to thank The Almighty Lala for his kind congrats. It will still take me a long time to reach the amount of awards that he has got. hopfully 2 good real ale pubs in the area at least. Froggi Froggi - 4 Apr 2008 18:47 |
| Congratulations with your entry in the Good Beer Guide 2008! Well done. georgeclooney - 2 Oct 2007 15:05 |
| i've just seen the beer list for the festival which starts on friday 28th and runs for 9 days, it's going to be hard to drink anywhere else for a week or so, lots of unusual ale for the area(as always) littlecon - 27 Sep 2007 08:55 |
| I have to agree with the below comments, and point out, again, that pub reviews are the only place people can talk about BITE, which is stupid and wasteful. There should be a message board s to allow the people who make it work, ie us posters, a chance to discus and air views about how it works and give us a better sense of ownership. I am also dubious about anonymous posters, but dafter than that is the fact that all a poster's reviews are displayed with a click on their name but the is no ranks given. I know some people are snooty about messageboard ranks but just having a number after a name shows everyone how much you've contributed. bradwan - 21 Sep 2007 11:08 |
I noticed your comment on the Wenlock Arms page. I think you will find that the speed that you go up and down the Top 40 ratings, is in direct proportion to the number of members that have rated your pub. Your pub has been rated by 62 users while the Wenlock has been rated 268 times. It is therefore a lot more difficult for spoilers to move the Wenlock's Top 40 position. I have a pub in Reading, which at present has a rating of 8.8/10 (rated by 22 users). If we get 3 more good reviews we should go top, but I don't expect to stay there for more than half an hour. I think that members shouldn't be allowed to post anonymous reviews (what are they trying to hide?). It is also impossible to see what other rubbish they may have written. If the username is displayed, as in "smiff", you can click on his name and see he has only made 3 reviews and slated every pub! I also think you shouldn't be allowed to rate a pub without reviewing it. I bet there are a lot of people out there with a dozen different usernames, purely to manipulate the Top 40. I haven't been in you're pub yet, but I'll be reviewing it soon - so watch out. P.S. We've got Whole Hearted in our pub at the moment! meeko - 21 Sep 2007 09:35 |
see more reviews |
| Blog | Forums | Copyright Neransk Limited 2001-2008. All Rights Reserved. |




